Year : 2016 | Volume
| Issue : 3 | Page : 335-338
Anesthetic management of Amplatzer atrial septal defect closure device embolization to right ventricular outflow tract
S Das1, P Kumar1, V Bhardwaj1, R Palleti2
1 Department of Cardiac Anesthesia, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
2 Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
Department of Cardiac Anesthesia, 7th Floor, Cardiothoracic Sciences Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi - 110 029
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
|Date of Web Publication||2-Jun-2016|
Percutaneous device closure of atrial septal defect (ASD) is an alternative treatment to surgery with advantages of avoidance of surgery, short procedure time, early discharge from hospital, and lower rates of complications. However, percutaneous device closure is associated with infrequent life-threatening complications such as device embolization. We report a case device embolization of the ASD occlude device into right ventricular outflow tract resulting progressive hypoxia. The role of anesthesiologist as a team leader in managing such emergency is discussed.
Keywords: Amplatzer device embolization; anesthetic management; atrial septal defect; cardiac catheterization laboratory; transesophageal echocardiography
|How to cite this article:|
Das S, Kumar P, Bhardwaj V, Palleti R. Anesthetic management of Amplatzer atrial septal defect closure device embolization to right ventricular outflow tract. Saudi J Anaesth 2016;10:335-8
|How to cite this URL:|
Das S, Kumar P, Bhardwaj V, Palleti R. Anesthetic management of Amplatzer atrial septal defect closure device embolization to right ventricular outflow tract. Saudi J Anaesth [serial online] 2016 [cited 2023 Feb 2];10:335-8. Available from: https://www.saudija.org/text.asp?2016/10/3/335/174911
| Introduction|| |
Atrial septal defect (ASD) is a persistent communication between two atria. The gold standard treatments for ASD are surgical closure. Percutaneous device closure has proven to be effective and safe as an alternative therapy to surgical repair.  Percutaneous device closure has several advantages over surgery including less surgical morbidity, avoidance of a scar, and reduced hospitalization duration.  However, the procedure or device related complications are potentially fatal.  We report a rare case of acute embolization of ASD device to right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) leading to hypoxia. The management of the case is discussed with a review of literatures.
| Case Report|| |
A 34-year-old female was referred to cardiology outpatient department with complains of shortness of breath and palpitation. Chest X-ray showed increased broncho-vascular markings. Electrocardiogram showed P pulmonale, right ventricular hypertrophy, and heart rate (HR) 100/min with normal sinus rhythm. The two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) revealed a large ostium secundum ASD (26 mm × 21 mm) having left to right shunt with mild tricuspid regurgitation (TR), moderate pulmonary artery (PA) hypertension, and left ventricular ejection fraction of 60%. The patient was recruited for trans-catheter ASD device closure. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) was performed in catheterization laboratory (CL) and revealed a large secundum ASD measuring 26 mm size, with sufficient rims surrounding ASD. On catheterization, right ventricular pressure recorded as 55/20 mm Hg with mean 34 mm Hg. Amplatzer ASD occluder (St. Jude Medical, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA) of 36 mm diameter was implanted under monitored anesthesia care with propofol and fentanyl. After 5 min, peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO 2 ) dropped to 90% with blood pressure (BP) 130/82 mm Hg and HR 110/min. Repeat TTE detected migration of ASD device to RVOT.
Catheter guided retrieval was tried but failed. The SpO 2 dropped further to 80% with BP 82/46 mm Hg and HR 124/min. Tracheal intubation was done and the patient shifted to operating room (OR). Intraoperative TEE revealed, device below pulmonary valve in the RVOT [Figure 1], a large ASD and severe TR [Figure 2]. After heparinization with activated clotting time >480 s, cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) was established. After opening the right atrial chamber, surgeon noticed an abrasion in the anterior part of inter-atrial septum; the device was stucked in posterior chordae tendineae of tricuspid valve [Figure 3]. The device was retrieved followed by Dacron patch closure of ASD and tricuspid valve repair. The patient was weaned from CPB with infusion of nitroglycerine 1 μg/kg/m and TEE confirmed successful closure of ASD [Figure 4].
|Figure 1: Transesophageal echocardiography two-dimensional color Doppler mid esophageal modified right ventricle inflow outflow view showing atrial septal defect device (indicated by white arrow) at right ventricular outflow tract and obstructing pulmonary artery flow. AD: Amplatzer device; RV: Right ventricle|
Click here to view
|Figure 2: Transesophageal echocardiography two-dimensional mid esophageal modified bicaval view showing atrial septal defect with adequate rim. RA: Right atrium; LA: Left atrium|
Click here to view
|Figure 3: Surgical image showing Amplatzer device (indicated by white arrow) obstructing right ventricular outflow tract|
Click here to view
|Figure 4: Transesophageal echocardiography two-dimensional color Doppler mid esophageal right ventricle inflow outflow view showing retrieval of atrial septal defect device. There is no right ventricular outflow tract obstruction and no residual septal defect. RV: Right ventricle; RA: Right atrium; LA: Left atrium|
Click here to view
Hemodynamic parameters remained stable with SpO 2 100%. Intraoperative period was uneventful. The patient was shifted to intensive care unit and extubated after 6 h. In postoperative period, Doppler ultrasonography was performed which showed normal flow in bilateral femoral arteries and veins. The patient was discharged from hospital on the seventh postoperative day.
| Discussion|| |
The first percutaneous device closure of ASD was performed in 1974. Echocardiographic evaluation of rim quality and measurement of the gradients help inappropriate selection of the patient for the procedure. During the intervention, TEE guidance confirms the echocardiographic findings and assists in deployment procedures. Immediate procedural success rate of Amplatzer septal occluder is 95-98%. The amplatzer device stents the defect, and occlusion is achieved partly by the thin Dacron patch inserts but mainly by in situ thrombosis and subsequent endothelialization.  Adverse events such as arrhythmia, cerebral embolism, cardiac tamponade, and device embolization requiring immediate surgical removal can occur. Among these device embolization is potentially life-threatening.  The reported incidence is 0.01-0.55% and can be higher in less experienced operators. 
Clinical presentations depend on localization and orientation of the embolic device. When ASD devices embolized, usually there is no significant hemodynamic compromise even when a large device passed through or lodged in a ventricle but when it migrates to RVOT/PA or left side of the heart patient may become symptomatic and life-threatening. 
The same situation happened in our case by embolization of device in RVOT and obstructing PA blood flow resulting in severe hypoxia and hypotension. The immediate management was surgical removal of the errant device and closure of the ASD. Percutaneous retrieval can be attempted by using the devices including large sheaths, gooseneck snares, or endomyocardial biopsy forcep.  An uncomplicated surgical retrieval of a device and closure of an ASD can be made significantly more complicated by an ill-advised attempt of retrieval of an embolized device particularly if the device embolized to the PA or either ventricle.  In our case, the device was stuck in posterior chordae tendineae of tricuspid valve hence percutaneous retrieval was unsuccessful.
The common reasons for the device embolization immediately after the procedure are undersized ASD device, small left atrium to accommodate the device, inadequate or floppy rim, and operator-related technical issues.  Device embolism may also occur during the late periods of postimplantation. The patients at high risk of device embolism must be followed more carefully by echocardiography.
Anesthesia for ASD device closure in the CL might be challenging due to its remote location. Anesthesia modalities for device closure are general anesthesia with tracheal intubation, total intravenous anesthesia, and monitored anesthesia care. General anesthesia is preferred for facilitating the insertion of TEE probe. During the procedure, hemodynamic alteration in form of arrhythmia, alteration in BP, and HR can occur. The complication such as device embolization produces immediate hemodynamic and respiratory threat as in this case report. Anesthesiologist has to be vigilant and prepared to manage such emergency scenario. Transfer of patient from CL to OR is again the role of anesthesiologist in coordinating the team with simultaneous stabilization of patient's vitals. In the OR, anesthesiologist may perform TEE to guide surgeon for location of device and its complete retrieval. The successful closure of ASD could be confirmed by postoperative TEE.
| Conclusion|| |
Application of strict criteria for selecting ASD device closure by comprehensive evaluation and careful monitoring for the possible embolization of device are mandatory. Anesthesiologists not only play greater role in administering anesthesia in remote location but also pivotal in stabilizing vital parameters in the moment of hypoxia and hemodynamic instability due to device embolization. Anesthesiologist may act as a team leader in coordinating such type of emergency.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Jo SS, Han SJ, Jung MJ, Lee SJ, Seol KH, Kim GH, et al
. Transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect using Amplatzer septal occluder. Korean Circ J 2002;32:17-24.
Chessa M, Carminati M, Butera G, Bini RM, Drago M, Rosti L, et al.
Early and late complications associated with transcatheter occlusion of secundum atrial septal defect. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39:1061-5.
Berdat PA, Chatterjee T, Pfammatter JP, Windecker S, Meier B, Carrel T. Surgical management of complications after transcatheter closure of an atrial septal defect or patent foramen ovale. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000;120:1034-9.
Sharafuddin MJ, Gu X, Titus JL, Urness M, Cervera-Ceballos JJ, Amplatz K. Transvenous closure of secundum atrial septal defects: Preliminary results with a new self-expanding nitinol prosthesis in a swine model. Circulation 1997;95:2162-8.
Majunke N, Bialkowski J, Wilson N, Szkutnik M, Kusa J, Baranowski A, et al.
Closure of atrial septal defect with the Amplatzer septal occluder in adults. Am J Cardiol 2009;103:550-4.
Levi DS, Moore JW. Embolization and retrieval of the Amplatzer septal occluder. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2004;61:543-7.
Ko SF, Liang CD, Yip HK, Huang CC, Ng SH, Huang CF, et al.
Amplatzer septal occluder closure of atrial septal defect: Evaluation of transthoracic echocardiography, cardiac CT, and transesophageal echocardiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;193:1522-9.
Balbi M, Pongiglione G, Bezante GP. Percutaneous rescue of left ventricular embolized Amplatzer septal occluder device. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2008;72:559-62.
Mullins EC. Cardiac Catheterization in Congenital Heart Disease: Pediatric and Adult. Vol. 29. Chapter 28, Transcatheter Atrial Septal Defect (ASD) Occlusion, Wiley-Blackwell publication, NJ, USA, 2007. p. 728-79.
Kijima Y, Taniguchi M, Akagi T, Nakagawa K, Kusano K, Ito H, et al.
Torn atrial septum during transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect visualized by real-time three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2010; 23:1222.e5-8.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]
|This article has been cited by|
||Role of an Anaesthesiologist in the Management of an Embolised ASD Closure Device - Journey from Cathlab to OT
| ||Anjali Modak, Shivani Rao, Amol Singam, Mangesh Choudhari |
| ||Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences. 2020; 9(42): 3175 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|