|
Previous article 
Next article |
|
|
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2017 | Volume
: 11
| Issue : 4 | Page : 408-414
Reducing by 50% the incidence of maternal hypotension during elective caesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia: Effect of prophylactic ondansetron and/or continuous infusion of phenylephrine - a double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled trial
Jose Ramon Ortiz-Gomez1, Francisco Javier Palacio-Abizanda2, Francisco Morillas-Ramirez2, Inocencia Fornet-Ruiz3, Ana Lorenzo-Jiménez2, Maria Lourdes Bermejo-Albares2
1 Department of Anaesthesiology, Hospital Complex of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
2 Department of Anaesthesiology, Gregorio Marañón Hospital, Madrid, Spain
3 Department of Anaesthesiology, Hospital Puerta de Hierro, Madrid, Spain
Correspondence Address:
Jose Ramon Ortiz-Gomez
Department of Anaesthesiology, Hospital Complex of Navarra, Section D, Carretera Aoiz s/n, Planta Baja, 31486 Elcano – Egüés, Navarra
Spain
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/sja.SJA_237_17
| Date of Web Publication | 22-Sep-2017 |
|
|
Background: Prophylactic administrations of ondansetron or phenylephrine have been reported to provide a protective effect against hypotension in women undergoing cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia (SA). The main hypothesis is that ondansetron improves the hemodynamic response, especially combined with phenylephrine infusion.
Methods: This prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study included 265 healthy pregnant women scheduled for elective cesarean delivery under SA. Women were randomly allocated into four groups to receive either placebo (control), ondansetron (O) 8 mg intravenously before induction of SA, phenylephrine infusion (50 mcg/min) (P) or ondansetron plus phenylephrine (OP). Demographic, obstetric, intraoperative timing, and anesthetic variables were assessed at 16 time points. Anesthetic variables assessed included blood pressure, heart rate, oxygen saturation, nausea, vomiting, electrocardiographic changes, skin flushing, discomfort or pruritus, and vasopressor requirements.
Results: There were differences (P = 0.0001) in the number of patients with hypotension (50.8% control, 44.6% O, 20.9% P, 25.0% OP), the percentage of time points (P = 0.0001) with systolic hypotension per patient (17.4% control, 8.7% O, 2.1% P, 6.7% OP) and the number of patients requiring supplementary boluses of ephedrine (P = 0.003), phenylephrine (P = 0.017) or atropine (P = 0.0001).
Conclusions: A 50 μg/min phenylephrine infusion reduces by 50%, the incidence of maternal hypotension compared with placebo, but infusions of phenylephrine are still not routine in our environment. Prophylactic ondansetron 8 mg might be considered in this situation, because it does not reduce the incidence of maternal hypotension but diminishes its severity, reducing the number of hypotensive events per patient by 50%.
Keywords: Cesarean delivery; hypotension; ondansetron; phenylephrine; spinal anesthesia
How to cite this article:
Ortiz-Gomez JR, Palacio-Abizanda FJ, Morillas-Ramirez F, Fornet-Ruiz I, Lorenzo-Jiménez A, Bermejo-Albares ML. Reducing by 50% the incidence of maternal hypotension during elective caesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia: Effect of prophylactic ondansetron and/or continuous infusion of phenylephrine - a double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled trial. Saudi J Anaesth 2017;11:408-14 |
How to cite this URL:
Ortiz-Gomez JR, Palacio-Abizanda FJ, Morillas-Ramirez F, Fornet-Ruiz I, Lorenzo-Jiménez A, Bermejo-Albares ML. Reducing by 50% the incidence of maternal hypotension during elective caesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia: Effect of prophylactic ondansetron and/or continuous infusion of phenylephrine - a double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled trial. Saudi J Anaesth [serial online] 2017 [cited 2023 Mar 23];11:408-14. Available from: https://www.saudija.org/text.asp?2017/11/4/408/215411 |
| Introduction | |  |
Spinal anesthesia (SA) is the most common used anesthetic technique for cesarean delivery. However, it frequently produced hypotension [1],[2] (30% or greater decrease in the mean arterial pressure (MAP) in nearly one-half of mothers [3]) that may induce maternal and/or fetal problems.[2],[4]
Decreases in cardiac output and systemic vascular resistance are the main contributors to hypotension with sympathetic nerve blockade. The Bezold–Jarisch and reverse Bainbridge reflexes can also induce bradycardia. Maintaining systemic vascular resistance, venous capacitance, and splanchnic venous tone is likely to be key factors in preventing a decrease in maternal cardiac output.[5],[6]
Several strategies have been used to decrease the occurrence of hypotension,[2] but none has been shown to eliminate the need to treat it. Ephedrine was historically considered the gold standard vasopressor for the management of SA-induced hypotension. However, phenylephrine is recommended now because of lower rate of fetal acidosis compared with ephedrine.[7] Hence, prophylactic infusion of phenylephrine is habitual in some institutions [8] but is not universally extended.
Previous administration of ondansetron [9] may attenuate arterial hypotension by blocking serotonin-induced bradycardia.
| Methods | | |
We evaluated in this study the effect of ondansetron 8 mg (with and without phenylephrine 50 μg/min) compared with placebo and phenylephrine infusion.
The main hypothesis is that the addition of intravenous ondansetron 8 mg improves the hemodynamic response following SA in healthy American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I pregnant women undergoing elective cesarean delivery, especially combined with phenylephrine infusion.
This was a prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled, and randomized study. The clinical trial was registered in the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry with allocation ID: ACTRN12616000884404, Web address: https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?ACTRN=12616000884404.
After institutional ethical committee approval, 300 ASA class I women scheduled for lower segment cesarean delivery under SA were enrolled during anesthesia consultation or early in the third trimester. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients to participate in this study. Exclusion criteria included refusal to participate, contraindication to SA, age <20 or >45 years, obesity (body mass index [BMI] at term >30 kg/m 2), ASA ≥2, previous fluid therapy and history of allergy to or side effects from ondansetron or phenylephrine.
Women were fasted for 8 h before surgery. They did not receive premedication. Peripheral venous access was secured with an 18-gauge cannula. Ten minutes after arrival in the operating room, baseline values for oxygen saturation (SaO2), electrocardiography, and noninvasive blood pressure were recorded in the supine position with 15° left tilt. These were considered the baseline data.
SA was induced in the sitting position at the L3–L4 or L4–L5 interspace, with a 27-gauge Whitacre (Braun, Melsungen, Germany) needle. We administered 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (Inibsa, Barcelona, Spain), according to the following formula: Bupivacaine (mg) = height (cm) × 0.06, with fentanyl (Kern Pharma, Tarrasa, Spain) 20 μg. Following injection, patients were immediately placed in supine with 15° left tilt. All women were rapidly coloaded with colloid 8 mL/kg (Voluven, Fresenius Kabi, Barcelona, Spain).
Sensory block height level was checked by assessing the perception of coldness using an alcohol swab, and motor block using the Bromage scale, both at 7 and 15 min after intrathecal injection.
Women were previously randomly allocated by our Statistical Department into four groups to receive placebo [control group], intravenous ondansetron (Zofran, GlaxoSmithKline, Parma, Italy) 8 mg [O group], phenylephrine (Phenylephrine, Genfarma Laboratories, Toledo, Spain) 50 μg/min [P group] or ondansetron 8 mg plus phenylephrine 50 μg/min [OP group]. An anesthesia nurse verified the allocation and prepared ondansetron 8 mg with 0.9% saline solution to a total volume of 10 mL or a placebo of 0.9% saline solution 10 mL and phenylephrine 10 mg with 0.9% saline solution to a total volume of 49 mL or a placebo of 0.9% saline solution 50 mL.
The syringes had no identifying markers indicating group allocation. The nurse injected the contents of the 10-mL syringe intravenously over 60 s, 5 min before the lumbar puncture was performed, and then started the 50-mL syringe IV continuous infusion at 15 mL/h. The anesthetist caring for the woman was blinded to group allocation.
Hypotension was defined using the criteria outlined in the Cochrane review of hypotension in obstetrics as systolic blood pressure (SBP) <75% of baseline,[2],[10] and in this case, treatment was initiated with intravenous ephedrine (Ephedrine, Genfarma Laboratories, Toledo, Spain) 10 mg or phenylephrine 50 μg (if the maternal heart rate [HR] was >95 beats/min, given over 30 s to avoid bradycardia). Intravenous atropine (Atropine, Serra Pamies, Reus, Spain) 0.01 mg/kg was administered if the maternal HR was <45 beats/min.
The anesthetist recorded demographic data (age, height, BMI), obstetric data (indication for cesarean delivery, gestation, number of previous pregnancies, cesarean deliveries, uterine pathology), intraoperative timing (time from dural puncture to skin incision, time from skin incision to delivery, total time of the surgery), and anesthetic variables SBP, diastolic blood pressure [DBP], MAP, HR, SaO2, adverse effects (nausea, vomiting, electrocardiographic changes, skin flushing, discomfort, pruritus) and the need for atropine, ephedrine, or phenylephrine. Anesthetic variables were recorded before administration of the study drug and then at 2 min intervals for 15 min and 5 min intervals for a further 30 min after intrathecal injection, as well as at the end of surgery.
Our protocol allowed the administration of intravenous acetaminophen 1 g and supplementary doses of fentanyl 50 μg (maximum of three doses) if the patient felt pain during surgery. General anesthesia could be administered if anesthesia was still inadequate. The protocol dictated that women requiring supplementation analgesia were removed from the study.
We used low doses of oxytocin (1 U) after umbilical cord clamping, followed by an infusion of 2.5 U/h, to avoid side effects, which could affect hemodynamics.
Finally, a complete umbilical cord blood gases analysis and Apgar values at 1st and 5th min were performed when continuous infusion of phenylephrine was used (due to the small but statistically significant increase in umbilical artery pH previously reported).[11]
Statistical analysis
Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS 21 statistical software package (IBM, New York, USA). The sample size was calculated to obtain a Cohen's d effect size = 1.0.
Comparison of means of independent samples was performed using ANOVA, followed by Dunnett's test for post hoc testing, and repeated measures ANOVA was used for paired data. Association between qualitative variables was performed using the Chi-square test with Fisher's exact test where appropriate.
Trends were studied with the Chi-square for linear trend test. P < 0.05 was considered significant.
Hemodynamic data (SBP, DBP, MAP, HR, and SaO2) were replotted using a format where all values were expressed as the correspondent percentage related to the baseline value (considered as 100%) to reveal a more discrete pattern of change, so each patient served as her own control.
| Results | | |
A total of 300 women were recruited into the study [Consort Flow Diagram]: 29 excluded, 271 randomized, and finally, 265 cases were considered valid (control group (n = 65), O group (n = 65), P group (n = 67), and OP group (n = 68)).
Demographic and anesthetic data are presented in [Table 1]. No differences between groups were observed in obstetric data including gestational age, previous pregnancies, and cesarean deliveries excepting the times from skin incision to fetal extraction and the total time.
[Table 2] shows the hypotensive events and the need of ephedrine, phenylephrine, and atropine. The patients who received ondansetron had differences in the number of patients with hypotension at O versusP groups (P = 0.005), O versus OP groups (P = 0.024) but no differences comparing O versuscontrol groups (P = 0.482) and OP versus P groups (P = 0.487). As a single patient could have more than one hypotensive episode, we also analyzed the percentage of time points with systolic hypotension. The patients who received ondansetron had differences at O versus P groups (P = 0.003), O versus control groups (P = 0.010) but no differences comparing O versusOP groups (P = 0.461) and OP versus P groups (P = 0.059).
Hemodynamics is shown in [Figure 1] (maternal arterial pressures). Variations from baseline are exposed in [Figure 2] (SBP) and [Figure 3] (MAP) and the adverse effects in [Table 3]. There were significant differences (P< 0.05) between the groups in HR at 1 min to end time points and no differences in SaO2 values. | Figure 1: Maternal blood pressure. Significant differences (P < 0.05) between the groups in systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and mean arterial pressure at 5 min to end time points
Click here to view |
 | Figure 2: Variation in systolic blood pressure compared to baseline. Significant differences (P < 0.05) between groups in the variation from baseline of systolic blood pressure at 5 min to 40 min
Click here to view |
 | Figure 3: Variation in mean blood pressure compared to baseline. Significant differences (P < 0.05) between groups in the variation from baseline of mean arterial pressure at 5 min to end time points
Click here to view |
There were no differences between groups P and OP in the following fetal data (mean ± SD): weight (3.0 ± 0.4 kg), Apgar score at the 1st min (8.8 ± 0.6) and 5th min (9.9 ± 0.3), pH (7.32 ± 0.05), PCO2 (50.1 ± 8.9 mm Hg), PO2 (18.5 ± 8.9 mm Hg), and HCO3− (23.1 ± 2.4 mEq/L). The resuscitation was type I (no need of reanimation) and II (oxygen mask): 76.5% group OP versus 98.5% group P and 23.5% group OP versus 1.5% group P, respectively (P = 0.0001). There were no neonates with resuscitation type III (intermittent positive pressure oxygen therapy), IV (endotracheal intubation), or V (cardiac massage and/or drugs).
| Discussion | | |
Infusion of phenylephrine is one of the most effective methods for preventing maternal hypotension and intraoperative nausea and vomiting.[12],[13] The most usual initial bolus dose of phenylephrine for the treatment of postspinal hypotension in patients undergoing elective cesarean delivery is 100 μg although some authors recommend higher doses (125–150 μg).[14] However, we prefer a prophylactic infusion of phenylephrine, which has been used previously with doses ranging from 10 to 100 μg/min. We administered 50 μg/min because this rate appears to balance the risk of hypotension versus reactive hypertension.[13],[15],[16]
Various studies have reported that intravenous ondansetron (8 mg in the general population [17] and 4 mg in obstetric patients [18]) could attenuate hypotension in patients receiving SA. Ortiz-Gómez et al.[9] found that prophylactic ondansetron did not influence the incidence of maternal hypotension following SA for elective cesarean delivery.
Our results indicated that prophylactic ondansetron (group O) had no effect on the total number of patients with hypotension (P = 0.482) compared with control but has a certain protective effect diminishing the number of hypotensive events (1.4 ± 2.2 vs. 2.9 ± 4.0, P = 0.011), the percentage of time points with systolic hypotension per patient (8.7% in the O group vs. 17.4% in the control group, respectively, P = 0.012), and the number of patients requiring supplementary boluses of ephedrine (P = 0.042).
Hence, prophylactic ondansetron appears to reduce significantly the severity of maternal hypotension and could reduce the possibility of maternal and fetal morbidity, but the combination of ondansetron and phenylephrine does not improve the hemodynamic in this clinical trial compared with phenylephrine infusion only.
Our results are similar to those reported by Trabelsi et al.[19] However, it should be noted that different hypotension's management protocols were used. They found that prophylactic ondansetron (4 mg) had a significant effect on the incidence of hypotension in healthy parturient undergoing SA for elective cesarean delivery. They suggested that ondansetron may act at cardiac level (enhancing contractility and efficiency) and at vascular level (stable systemic vascular resistances) through vascular and/or medullar specific receptors. This is an interesting hypothesis and could be the reason that explains the lack of differences between the groups of phenylephrine and phenylephrine plus ondansetron, found in this study.
Concerning the adverse effects, those most frequently related to ondansetron are diarrhea, fever, headache, and skin flushing although more important clinically adverse effects have been reported such as electrocardiographic changes, proarrhythmic activity, coronary vasospasm, and acute myocardial ischemia.[9] We only found statistical differences in the incidence of skin flushing in the O group (18.5%) (P = 0.001), but we cannot attribute it to ondansetron, because the OP group had no patients with skin flushing.
Finally, despite the previously reported absence of significant neonatal acid–base status changes when phenylephrine was administered,[13],[20] we verified this affirmation in all patients receiving phenylephrine. Trabelsi et al. also reported that ondansetron can be helpful to improve metabolic and vital parameters of newborns.[19]
| Conclusions | | |
A 50 μg/min phenylephrine infusion reduces by 50%, the incidence of maternal hypotension in healthy women undergoing SA for elective cesarean delivery compared with placebo, but infusions of phenylephrine are still not routine in our environment. Prophylactic ondansetron 8 mg might be considered in this situation, because although it does not reduce the incidence of maternal hypotension, diminishes its severity, reducing the number of hypotensive events per patient by 50%.
Acknowledgment
The authors are indebted to all patients participating in this study and the staff of the Department of Anaesthesiology.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References | | |
| 1. | Carpenter RL, Caplan RA, Brown DL, Stephenson C, Wu R. Incidence and risk factors for side effects of spinal anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1992;76:906-16.  |
| 2. | Cyna AM, Andrew M, Emmett RS, Middleton P, Simmons SW. Techniques for preventing hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006;4:CD002251. |
| 3. | Maayan-Metzger A, Schushan-Eisen I, Todris L, Etchin A, Kuint J. Maternal hypotension during elective cesarean section and short-term neonatal outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;202:56.e1-5. |
| 4. | Habib AS. A review of the impact of phenylephrine administration on maternal hemodynamics and maternal and neonatal outcomes in women undergoing cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. Anesth Analg 2012;114:377-90. |
| 5. | Sharwood-Smith G, Drummond GB. Hypotension in obstetric spinal anaesthesia: A lesson from pre-eclampsia. Br J Anaesth 2009;102:291-4. |
| 6. | Langesæter E, Dyer RA. Maternal haemodynamic changes during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2011;24:242-8. |
| 7. | Veeser M, Hofmann T, Roth R, Klöhr S, Rossaint R, Heesen M. Vasopressors for the management of hypotension after spinal anesthesia for elective caesarean section. Systematic review and cumulative meta-analysis. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2012;56:810-6. |
| 8. | Alahuhta S, Räsänen J, Jouppila P, Jouppila R, Hollmén AI. Ephedrine and phenylephrine for avoiding maternal hypotension due to spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. Effects on uteroplacental and fetal haemodynamics. Int J Obstet Anesth 1992;1:129-34. |
| 9. | Ortiz-Gómez JR, Palacio-Abizanda FJ, Morillas-Ramirez F, Fornet-Ruiz I, Lorenzo-Jiménez A, Bermejo-Albares ML. The effect of intravenous ondansetron on maternal haemodynamics during elective caesarean delivery under spinal anaesthesia: A double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Int J Obstet Anesth 2014;23:138-43. |
| 10. | Birnbach DJ, Browne IM. Anesthesia for obstetrics. In: Miller RD, Eriksson LI, Fleisher L, Weiner-Kronish JP, editors. Miller's Anesthesia. 7 th ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 2010. p. 2203-40. |
| 11. | Ngan Kee WD, Khaw KS, Ng FF. Comparison of phenylephrine infusion regimens for maintaining maternal blood pressure during spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section. Br J Anaesth 2004;92:469-74. |
| 12. | Butwick AJ, Columb MO, Carvalho B. Preventing spinal hypotension during Caesarean delivery: What is the latest? Br J Anaesth 2015;114:183-6. |
| 13. | Allen TK, George RB, White WD, Muir HA, Habib AS. A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of four fixed rate infusion regimens of phenylephrine for hemodynamic support during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Anesth Analg 2010;111:1221-9. |
| 14. | Mohta M, Harisinghani P, Sethi AK, Agarwal D. Effect of different phenylephrine bolus doses for treatment of hypotension during spinal anaesthesia in patients undergoing elective caesarean section. Anaesth Intensive Care 2015;43:74-80. |
| 15. | Stewart A, Fernando R, McDonald S, Hignett R, Jones T, Columb M. The dose-dependent effects of phenylephrine for elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. Anesth Analg 2010;111:1230-7. |
| 16. | Hall PA, Bennett A, Wilkes MP, Lewis M. Spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: Comparison of infusions of phenylephrine and ephedrine. Br J Anaesth 1994;73:471-4. |
| 17. | Owczuk R, Wenski W, Polak-Krzeminska A, Twardowski P, Arszulowicz R, Dylczyk-Sommer A, et al. Ondansetron given intravenously attenuates arterial blood pressure drop due to spinal anesthesia: A double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2008;33:332-9. |
| 18. | Sahoo T, SenDasgupta C, Goswami A, Hazra A. Reduction in spinal-induced hypotension with ondansetron in parturients undergoing caesarean section: A double-blind randomised, placebo-controlled study. Int J Obstet Anesth 2012;21:24-8. |
| 19. | Trabelsi W, Romdhani C, Elaskri H, Sammoud W, Bensalah M, Labbene I, et al. Effect of ondansetron on the occurrence of hypotension and on neonatal parameters during spinal anesthesia for elective caesarean section: A prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind study. Anesthesiol Res Pract 2015;2015:158061. |
| 20. | Ngan Kee WD, Khaw KS, Ng FF, Lee BB. Prophylactic phenylephrine infusion for preventing hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Anesth Analg 2004;98:815-21. |
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]
| This article has been cited by | | 1 |
Ondansetron Reduces the Incidence of Hypotension after Spinal Anaesthesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
|
| Xiao-Min Hou, Yan-Jun Chen, Lan Lai, Ke Liu, Qi-Hong Shen | | Pharmaceuticals. 2022; 15(12): 1588 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 2 |
Low dose and the conventional dose of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine produce comparable outcomes in the lower segment caesarean section. An observational study |
|
| Sudhir Kumar, Neeta Santha | | Annals of African Medicine. 2022; 21(4): 390 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 3 |
Comparison of prophylactic phenylephrine infusion versus intravenous ondansetron on hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean section |
|
| HaniGharib Ali, NaglaaAbd ELatief | | Anesthesia: Essays and Researches. 2022; 0(0): 0 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 4 |
Association between intraoperative hypotension and postoperative nausea and vomiting: a retrospective analysis of 247 thyroidectomy cases |
|
| Hitomi Nakatani, Yusuke Naito, Mitsuru Ida, Mariko Sato, Naoko Okamoto, Tadashi Nishiwada, Masahiko Kawaguchi | | Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (English Edition). 2021; | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | |
|
|
|
| |
|
Search Pubmed for