Previous article Table of Contents  Next article

LETTERS TO EDITOR
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 13  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 399-401

Thoracic paravertebral and erector spinae plane block: A cadaveric study demonstrating different site of injections and similar destinations


1 Department of Anaesthesia, Sancheti Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India
2 Department of Anatomy, Bharati University Medical College, (Deemed), Pune, Maharashtra, India
3 Department of Anesthesiology, Basavatarakam Indo-American Cancer Hospital and Research Institute, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad, Telangana, India

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Sandeep Diwan
Department of Anaesthesia, Sancheti Hospital, Pune - 411 005, Maharashtra
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/sja.SJA_339_19

Rights and Permissions
Date of Web Publication5-Sep-2019
 


How to cite this article:
Diwan S, Garud R, Nair A. Thoracic paravertebral and erector spinae plane block: A cadaveric study demonstrating different site of injections and similar destinations. Saudi J Anaesth 2019;13:399-401

How to cite this URL:
Diwan S, Garud R, Nair A. Thoracic paravertebral and erector spinae plane block: A cadaveric study demonstrating different site of injections and similar destinations. Saudi J Anaesth [serial online] 2019 [cited 2022 Jun 26];13:399-401. Available from: https://www.saudija.org/text.asp?2019/13/4/399/265998



Sir,

Erector spinae plane (ESP) block was described by Forero et al. as an ultrasound (US)-guided interfacial plane block and was used successfully for managing chronic neuropathic pain.[1] ESP block is a novel technique for pain management. The exact mechanism of action of is not yet established. However, the anatomy, method of injection and extent of drug spread, doses and volume of local anesthetic needed are not very clear. Hence, this cadaveric study was planned to examine the mechanism of action and drug spread after a thoracic ESP block using methylene blue dye.

Hospital Ethics Committee approval was obtained for conduction this cadaveric study. In five unembalmed cadavers, US-guided left sided thoracic paravertebral (PV) and right-sided ESP injections were performed. Instead of dissection we planned for a transverse section on the following day. In five formalin-based prone cadavers a left-sided ESP block was performed with 20 ml injectate [0.1 ml methylene blue dye (1 ml = 10 mg methylene blue) and 19.9 ml normal saline] under US guidance. A total of 20 ml volume is required for injectate to spread to four to five levels. Using similar volumes right sided thoracic PV injections were also administered under US guidance in all five cadavers. Thus, in total there were ten injections made: five ESP block on left side and five PV injections of right. With the help of US and transducer placed parasagitally in craniocaudal orientation, needle tip was positioned under ESM at T4-T5 costotransverse junction. The needle tip was directed cephalad in ESP and injections were made at a moderate pressure (20 ml deposited over 40 s). After 24 h, transverse section of the cadavers was performed at 5 cm intervals at T4–T5 levels. [Figure 1] is a representative figure of the cadaveric section at the level of T4. After performing sections, spread of dye was looked for from the point of injection.
Figure 1: Cadaveric spread of methylene blue dye after an ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block on left and paravertebral block on right side as seen after transverse section at T4 vertebral level. (VB – Vertebral Body, PVe – Prevertebral area, Ao – Aorta, PvS – Paravertebral Space, VEpi – Ventral Epidural, IVF – Intervertebral Foramina, THnr – Thoracic nerve root, DEpi – Dorsal Epidural, CTJ- Costotransverse Junction, Rl - Retrolaminar, ESP – Erector Spinae Plane, SP – Spinous Process)

Click here to view


In all five cadavers there was bilateral medial retrolaminar spread, bilateral PV spread and bilateral epidural spread. All ESP injections were performed on left side after identifying the tip of needle below erector spinae muscle. All PV injections were performed on the right side after confirming the needle tip in the PV space. Dye spread on injection was checked using US and later by analysis of cadaveric sections. The dye spread could be seen medially over the retrolaminar area which travelled along the laminae up to the spinous process but did not cross the midline. After spreading laterally on both the sides across the costotransverse foramen, the dye seeped into the PV space. It engulfed the thoracic nerve root, reached intervertebral foramen, and was seen spreading across the entire epidural space (lateral, dorsal and ventral). Laterally, the dye spread was observed across the intercostal space soaking the intercostal nerve. A similar dye spread occurred retrograde from the thoracic PV space into ESP posteriorly, intervertebral foramen, and epidural space medially. In two specimens the dye encroached as far as the prevertebral area on either side. The endothoracic fascia was sharply delineated, without any spillage into the thoracic cavity.

Ivanusic study concluded that there was no spread of dye anteriorly to the paravertebral space to involve origins of the ventral and dorsal branches of the thoracic spinal nerves. Dorsal ramus involvement was posterior to the costotransverse foramen.[2] The reason for this could be the presence of complex ligamentous attachment that possibly prevents the anterior spread of injectate. Yang et al. compared retrolaminar and ESP spread in unembalmed cadavers.[3] US-guided injections were performed in prone position using green colored ink, latex solution, and distilled water (total volume: 20 ml). The dye injections revealed posterior spread of dye to back muscles, PV spread beyond the superior costotransverse ligament, and thoracic spinal nerves after ESP block. Adhikary et al. had observed epidural and neuroforaminal spread of radiocontrast after US-guided ESP and retrolaminar blocks in cadavers which was confirmed by anatomic dissection and radiological findings.[4] However, they were not sure as to which of the either interventions lead to the spread as at each level, both ESP and retrolaminar blocks were performed at same level in the cadavers.

Based on US-guided dye injections in formalin-based cadavers we postulate that the probable mechanism of action of thoracic erector spinae blockade at the level of T4–T5 is through paravertebral and epidural blockade. We were not sure how much volume of one injection has encroached upon the contralateral intervertebral foramina and epidural spaces. This can be explained by using dye of different colors (e.g., methylene blue on one side and crimson red on another side).

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Forero M, Adhikary SD, Lopez H, Tsui C, Chin KJ. The erector spinae plane block: A novel analgesic technique in thoracic neuropathic pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2016;41:621-7.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Ivanusic J, Konishi Y, Barrington MJ. A cadaveric study investigating the mechanism of action of erector spinae blockade. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2018;43:567-71.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Yang HM, Choi YJ, Kwon HJ, O J, Cho TH, Kim SH. Comparison of injectate spread and nerve involvement between retrolaminar and erector spinae plane blocks in the thoracic region: A cadaveric study. Anesthesia 2018;73:1244-50.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Adhikary SD, Bernard S, Lopez H, Chin KJ. Erector spinae plane block versus retrolaminar block: A magnetic resonance imaging and anatomical study. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2018;43:756-62.  Back to cited text no. 4
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1]


This article has been cited by
1 Mechanisms of action of the erector spinae plane (ESP) block: a narrative review
Ki Jinn Chin, Kariem El-Boghdadly
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie. 2021; 68(3): 387
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Erector spinae plane block: A narrative review with systematic analysis of the evidence pertaining to clinical indications and alternative truncal blocks
Mohammed Saadawi, Sebastián Layera, Julián Aliste, Daniela Bravo, Prangmalee Leurcharusmee, De Q. Tran
Journal of Clinical Anesthesia. 2021; 68: 110063
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 Serratus Anterior Plane Block and Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Thoracic Epidural Analgesia for Perioperative Thoracotomy Pain Control: A Randomized Controlled Study
Walaa Y. Elsabeeny, Mostafa A. Ibrahim, Nahla N. Shehab, Abdelrahman Mohamed, Mohamed A. Wadod
Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia. 2021; 35(10): 2928
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
4 Randomized trial comparing the spread of erector spinae block with the combination of erector spinae block and retrolaminar block in soft embalmed Thiel cadavers
Razan Yousef Sartawi, Graeme McLeod, Ayman Mustafa, Clare Lamb
Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine. 2021; 46(12): 1061
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
5 Paraxial spinal nerve block
D.A. Svirskiy, E.E. Antipin, K.V. Paromov, E.F. Drobotova, E.V. Nedashkovsky
Anesteziologiya i reanimatologiya. 2021; (4): 128
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
6 Postoperative Analgesic Efficacy of Thoracic Paravertebral Block and Erector Spinae Plane Block Combination in Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery
Musa Zengin, Ramazan Baldemir, Gulay Ulger, Hilal Sazak, Ali Alagoz
Cureus. 2021;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
7 Spread of local anesthetic after thoracic erector spinae and thoracic paravertebral block in patients with multiple posterolateral rib fractures
Sandeep Diwan, Abhijit Nair
Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia. 2020; 14(4): 557
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
8 Evaluation of the Efficacy of the Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Pain in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Mehmet Hamza Gultekin, Abdullah Erdogan, Fethi Akyol
Journal of Endourology. 2020; 34(3): 267
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
9 Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Intercostal Nerve Block for Post-Minithoracotomy Acute Pain Management: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Silvia Fiorelli, Giulio Leopizzi, Cecilia Menna, Leonardo Teodonio, Mohsen Ibrahim, Erino Angelo Rendina, Alberto Ricci, Roberto Alberto De Blasi, Monica Rocco, Domenico Massullo
Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia. 2020; 34(9): 2421
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
 
Previous article    Next article
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  IN THIS Article
   References
   Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2194    
    Printed26    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded180    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 9    

Recommend this journal