| REVIEW ARTICLE |
|
| Year : 2019 | Volume
: 13
| Issue : 5 | Page : 52-58 |
|
|
The peer review process
Dmitry Tumin1, Joseph Drew Tobias2
1 Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, 2 Department of Pediatrics, Nationwide Children's Hospital and The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
2 Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital; Department of Pediatrics, Nationwide Children's Hospital and The Ohio State University; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio, USA
Correspondence Address:
Dr. Joseph Drew Tobias
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, 700 Children's Drive, Columbus, Ohio 43205
USA
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/sja.SJA_544_18
|
|
|
The peer review process provides a foundation for the credibility of scientific findings in medicine. The following article discusses the history of peer review in scientific and medical journals, the process for the selection of peer reviewers, and how journal editors arrive at a decision on submitted manuscripts. To aid authors who are invited to revise their manuscripts for further consideration, we outline steps for considering reviewer comments and provide suggestions for organizing the author's response to reviewers. We also examine ethical issues in peer review and provide recommendations for authors interested in becoming peer reviewers themselves.
|
|
|
|
| [FULL TEXT] [PDF]* |
|
 |
|
