Previous article Table of Contents  Next article

LETTERS TO EDITOR
Year : 2021  |  Volume : 15  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 454-455

Nitrites positive in urine: Pre-operative implications for anesthesiologist's


1 Department of Anaesthesiology, Ibra Hospital, Ministry of Health-Oman, P.O. Box 275, Ibra, Sultanate of Oman
2 Department of Anaesthesiology, Royal Hospital, Muscat, Ministry of Health-Oman, Sultanate of Oman

Correspondence Address:
Abhijit Nair
Department of Anaesthesiology, Ibra Hospital, Ministry of Health-Oman, P.O. Box 275, Ibra - 414
Sultanate of Oman
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/sja.sja_133_21

Rights and Permissions
Date of Submission22-Feb-2021
Date of Decision24-Feb-2021
Date of Acceptance02-Mar-2021
Date of Web Publication02-Sep-2021
 


How to cite this article:
Nair A, Seelam S. Nitrites positive in urine: Pre-operative implications for anesthesiologist's. Saudi J Anaesth 2021;15:454-5

How to cite this URL:
Nair A, Seelam S. Nitrites positive in urine: Pre-operative implications for anesthesiologist's. Saudi J Anaesth [serial online] 2021 [cited 2021 Dec 5];15:454-5. Available from: https://www.saudija.org/text.asp?2021/15/4/454/325274



To the Editor,

Pre-operative urinary tract infection (UTI) is alarming, and clinicians treat the UTI with appropriate antibiotics prior to elective surgery in symptomatic patients. Complete urine examination (CUE) is usually a part of preoperative surgical profile in many hospitals which is performed with dipstick method. Dipstick method estimates presence of nitrites in urine which is usually suggestive of UTI unless proved otherwise by a negative urine culture. Urine dipsticks are able to detect nitrites in the presence of bacteria >105 CFU/ml.

Urine culture is definitive for diagnosis of UTI but is costly and takes 48–72 h for the report. Bacteria like Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae produce nitrate reductase which converts the nitrate in urine to nitrite which is detected by the dipstick test during CUE. Certain urinary pathogens like Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterococci, Acinetobacter species and staphylococcus saprophyticus has shown to have low propensity to produce nitrite and thus could lead to false negative test. The sensitivity of a urine dipstick showing nitrites positive was demonstrated as 75% and specificity that is, those without UTI who test negative was 82% with a positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 79% and 76%, respectively.[1]

Several studies have shown that screening with dipstick leukocyte esterase and nitrite particularly in presence of asymptomatic bacteriuria was associated with many false positive and negative results. This leads to unnecessary postponement of surgeries and thus adds to overall cost of treatment.[2] The reason for false negative results is short time between urine collection and testing, amount of bacteriuria, urine pH less than 6.0, organisms that further reduce nitrites to ammonia, blood, dilute urine, proteinuria, glycosuria, presence of urobilinogen, certain medications like ascorbic acid. The sensitivity of this test in the neonates and infants is very low thus not reliable because the time required for reduction of nitrate to nitrite is at least 4 h stay of urine in bladder. False positive nitrite is observed in contaminated urine sample, exposure to air, and use of phenazopyridine.[3]

The principle of using nitrite estimation in urine is that most of the micro-organisms causing UTI has the ability of converting urinary nitrate to nitrite. The conversion occurs in urine which stays in the urinary bladder for a few hours (3-4 h). However, someone with more frequent urination will have less stasis in urinary bladder and thus will have false negative result. Therefore, an early morning sample is preferable than a random sample at any time of the day.[4]

Asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnancy is very common and treating this based on urine culture and antibiogram is still controversial and is treated by many centers during antenatal period especially in high risk parturient.[5] There are certain situations were asymptomatic bacteriuria needs to be investigated by ordering a urine culture and to treat it upfront. This is suggested prior to endo-urological procedures, prostatic surgeries, and prior to renal transplantation.[6],[7]

To conclude, urine dipstick method to detect nitrite is a cost-effective and rapid way of confirming UTI. But the decision to investigate a nitrite positive urine sample by sending urine culture should be decided on symptoms, type of surgery planned and general condition of the patient.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Chu CM, Lowder JL. Diagnosis and treatment of urinary tract infections across age groups. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018;219:40-51.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Walker S, Bisseling C, Curpad S, Edwards G. Current practice on the management of pre-operative urine dipstick results in women undergoing gynaecological surgery in Wales. J Obstet Gynaecol 2019;39:1143-7.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Mahyar A, Ayazi P, Froozesh M, Daneshi-Kohan MM, Barikani A. Can urinary nitrite results be used to conduct antimicrobial option for urinary tract infection in children? Iran J Pediatr 2012;22:237-40.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Givler DN, Givler A. Asymptomatic Bacteriuria. [Updated 2021 Jan 20]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2021 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK441848/. [Last accessed on 2021 Feb 21].  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Moore A, Doull M, Grad R, Groulx S, Pottie K, Tonelli M, et al. Canadian task force on preventive health care. Recommendations on screening for asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnancy. CMAJ 2018;190:E823-30.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Wullt B, Sundén F, Grabe M. Asymptomatic bacteriuria is harmless and even protective: Don't treat if you don't have a very specific reason. Eur Urol Focus 2019;5:15-6.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Averbeck MA, Rantell A, Ford A, Kirschner-Hermanns R, Khullar V, Wagg A, et al. Current controversies in urinary tract infections: ICI-RS 2017. Neurourol Urodyn 2018;37:S86-92.  Back to cited text no. 7
    




 

Top
 
Previous article    Next article
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  IN THIS Article
   References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed246    
    Printed8    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded48    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal