|
Previous article 
Next article |
|
|
LETTERS TO EDITOR
Year : 2023 | Volume
: 17
| Issue : 2 | Page : 293-295
The Maclean's technique: A novel approach to spinal anesthesia
Ruchi Kumari
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Maulana Azad Medical College and Associated Lok Nayak Hospital, New Delhi, India
Correspondence Address:
Ruchi Kumari
Maulana Azad Medical College and Associated Lok Nayak Hospital, New Delhi
India
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/sja.sja_560_22
| Date of Submission | 01-Aug-2022 |
| Date of Acceptance | 04-Aug-2022 |
| Date of Web Publication | 10-Mar-2023 |
|
|
How to cite this article:
Kumari R. The Maclean's technique: A novel approach to spinal anesthesia. Saudi J Anaesth 2023;17:293-5 |
The Editor,
Subarachnoid blocks are routinely performed by anesthesiologists in various surgical and endoscopic procedures. Correct identification and puncture of the subarachnoid space determines the success and failure of the technique.[1] Multiple attempts and difficult access to the subarachnoid spaces is a frequent problem that may lead to numerous complications like postdural puncture headache, transient neurological symptoms.[2] However, trauma to neural structures or a spinal hematoma can cause permanent neurological deficits.[3]
Conventional positioning for spinal or epidural anesthesia is when the patient lies laterally on the table with maximum flexion of the spine, hips, and the knees (fetal position) this is when the patient has a wide open interspinous space. But this kind of positioning is impractical in every single case, for example, in patients with trauma, fracture neck of femur, proximal femoral fracture, and sometimes in obstetric and obese patients, it is almost impossible to get the legs flexed.
Of course spinal anesthesia can be performed at ease with extended legs. In such situation, the patient is made to lie in lateral decubitus position with hips and knees extended.
The idea of successful subarachnoid block with extended legs is by identifying the highest and lowest points of the spinous process and to go about 0.5 cm paraspinous level at the lower border of the spinous process (Maclean's point) perpendicular to reach the subarachnoid space [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]. | Figure 1: Solid black line- spinous process, gap- interspinous space, orange dot- Maclean's point
Click here to view |
 | Figure 2: Radiological image depicting the Maclean's Point (yellow dot), drawing a line through it (lateral image), a direct path to subdural space (yellow line) can be seen
Click here to view |
 | Figure 3: Lumbar spine is slightly tilted to the side. Shaded yellow area with red dot shows the Maclean's Point.
Click here to view |
 | Figure 4: Highest and Lowest Point of Spinous Process (LPSP) is palpated and spinal needle is inserted 0.5 cm lateral to LPSP
Click here to view |
This could be done conventionally by gently palpating the lumbar spinous process with the pulp of the finger from above downward to identify the lowest point of the spinous process. The needle entry is then made about 0.5 cm lateral to the midline at the lowest point of the spinous process (Maclean's point) to get into the desired space. An ultrasound could also be used to identify, measure, and mark the spinous process, thereby aiding a successful block in obese patients.
Thereby, Maclean's technique could prove as a novel and useful technique where the patients are not able to flex their lower limbs for subarachnoid blocks.
Acknowledgments
Dr. Ruchi Kumari, MD Anaesthesiology, Maulana Azad Medical College and associated Lok Nayak Hospital, New Delhi – 110 002.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References | |  |
| 1. | Ružman T, Gulam D, Haršanji Drenjančević I, Venžera-Azenić D, Ružman N, Burazin J. Factors associated with difficult neuraxial blockade. Local Reg Anesth 2014;7:47-52.  |
| 2. | Gaiser R. Postdural puncture headache. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2006;19:249-53. |
| 3. | Kent CD, Bolland L. Neurological adverse events following regional anaesthesia administration. Local Reg Anesth 2010;3:115-23. |
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]
|
|
|
| Article Access Statistics | | | Viewed | 264 | | | Printed | 4 | | | Emailed | 0 | | | PDF Downloaded | 40 | | | Comments | [Add] | | |
|
|
Search Pubmed for