Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia

ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year
: 2010  |  Volume : 4  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 6--10

Low flow anesthesia: Efficacy and outcome of laryngeal mask airway versus pressure-optimized cuffed-endotracheal tube


Zeinab Ahmed El-Seify, Ahmed Metwally Khattab, Ashraf Shaaban, Dobrila Radojevic, Ivanka Jankovic 
 Department of Anesthesia, Doha Clinic Hospital, Doha, Qatar

Correspondence Address:
Zeinab Ahmed El-Seify
Department of Anesthesia, Doha Clinic Hospital, Doha
Qatar

Background: Low flow anesthesia can lead to reduction of anesthetic gas and vapor consumption. Laryngeal mask airway (LMA) has proved to be an effective and safe airway device. The aim of this study is to assess the feasibility of laryngeal mask airway during controlled ventilation using low fresh gas flow (1.0 L/min) as compared to endotracheal tube (ETT). Patients and Methods : Fifty nine non-smoking adult patients; ASA I or II, being scheduled for elective surgical procedures, with an expected duration of anesthesia 60 minutes or more, were randomly allocated into two groups - Group I (29 patients) had been ventilated using LMA size 4 for females and 5 for males respectively; and Group II (30 patients) were intubated using ETT. After 10 minutes of high fresh gas flow, the flow was reduced to 1 L/min. Patients were monitored for airway leakage, end-tidal CO 2 (ETCO 2 ), inspiratory and expiratory isoflurane and nitrous oxide fraction concentrations, and postoperative airway-related complications Results : Two patients in the LMA-group developed initial airway leakage (6.9%) versus no patient in ETT-group. Cough and sore throat were significantly higher in ETT patients. There were no evidences of differences between both groups regarding ETCO 2 , uptake of gases, nor difficulty in swallowing. Conclusion : The laryngeal mask airway proved to be effective and safe in establishing an airtight seal during controlled ventilation under low fresh gas flow of 1 L/min, inducing less coughing and sore throat during the immediate postoperative period than did the ETT, with continuous measurement and readjustment of the tube cuff pressure.


How to cite this article:
El-Seify ZA, Khattab AM, Shaaban A, Radojevic D, Jankovic I. Low flow anesthesia: Efficacy and outcome of laryngeal mask airway versus pressure-optimized cuffed-endotracheal tube.Saudi J Anaesth 2010;4:6-10


How to cite this URL:
El-Seify ZA, Khattab AM, Shaaban A, Radojevic D, Jankovic I. Low flow anesthesia: Efficacy and outcome of laryngeal mask airway versus pressure-optimized cuffed-endotracheal tube. Saudi J Anaesth [serial online] 2010 [cited 2022 Oct 5 ];4:6-10
Available from: https://www.saudija.org/article.asp?issn=1658-354X;year=2010;volume=4;issue=1;spage=6;epage=10;aulast=El-Seify;type=0